A dual processor VAX 11/780 Purdue University Technical Report TR-EE 81-31. Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems.
17 Richardson NE, Thomas JA, Lyche DK, Romlein J, Norton GS, Dolecek QE.Information systems integration in radiology. Understanding crosstalk in high-resolution color thin-film-transistor liquid crystal displays. Veiling glare point-spread function of medical imaging monitors. 14 Badano A, Flynn MJ, Muka E, Compton K, Monsees T.Accurate small-spot luminance measurements.
#Dark noise quality control test verification
Clinical verification of TG18 methodology for display quality evaluation. 11 Samei E, Shepard J, Fetterly KA, Roehrig H, Kim HJ, Flynn MJ.Great Falls, Va: Society for Computer Applications in Radiology, 2002 71-82. Quality assurance: meeting the challenge in the digital medical enterprise. New developments in display quality control. A comparison of case retrieval times: film versus picture archiving and communication systems. 9 Horii S, Levine BA, Groger G, et al.Incremental cost of department-wide implementation of a picture archiving and communication system and computed radiography. 7 Pratt HM, Langlotz CP, Feingold ER, et al.An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems. Great Falls, Va: Society for Computer Applications in Radiology, 2002 9-28. Quality control issues for computed and direct radiography. Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. 2 Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, Kato H.PACS component testing: beta and acceptance testing. Received revision requested July 16 and received August 27 accepted September 8.
From the AAPM/RSNA Tutorial on Equipment Selection at the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. 1From the Departments of Radiology, Physics, and Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, DUMC Box 3302, Durham, NC 27710 (E.S.) the Department of Radiology, University of California–Davis, Sacramento (J.A.S.) the Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco (K.A.) the Medical Imaging and Computer Applications Branch, Office of Science and Technology, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Md (A.B.) the Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (J.C.) the Departments of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System and University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (B.R.) Radiology Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich (M.J.F.) and the Department of Radiology Informatics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (P.C.).
0 kommentar(er)
